Featured Writer: Janos Sandor

Confessions of a Hypergraphic

 

After reading Alice Flaherty’s book The Midnight Disease, I knew I had the symptoms, although mine was more like a five-in-the-morning condition.  As a Harvard neurologist, Flaherty describes hypergraphia, the ‘midnight disease’, as a compulsive need to write from an emotional impulse, an irresistible urge  An extreme of case of hypergraphia is a schizophrenic whose hypergraphic writing, like speech, does not make sense.  Then there are lighter cases who compulsively write letters, notes, journals, novels, essays.  Hypergraphia leads to isolative behaviour, removed from people and community. 

 

Flaherty describes how hypergraphics may be bad writers, or talented writers like Dostoevsky.  Van Gogh, although a painter, is another suspected hypergraphic with his daily letters to his brother Theo.  With his creative psychotic bursts, Van Gogh produced a painting every thirty-six hours.  This led to speculation that great pieces of art and literature originate out of an abnormal emotional state -- this might explain why five out of the seven noble prize winning American authors were alcoholic.

 

What confirmed my hypergraphia condition is that hypergraphics have a tendency to be hyper-philosophical or hyper-religious.  In hypergraphic writing, little things in life take on great cosmic importance. The profile fits as for the last twenty-five years I have been writing six hours seven days a week about religious and philosophical issues. Although my hypergraphic condition has led to isolation from friends and community, I have accepted my fate to travel into an inner world that few people dare to travel.

 

I suspect that if Dr. Flaherty took a digital scan of my brain, she might find hypothalamus size differences -- as is the case with hypergraphic brains, a physiological explanation for an abnormal condition.  And perhaps here is where caution is advised when medical high priests and priestesses declare a new word to describe people’s abnormal behaviour. With gusto science is keen to be the authority of our reality, techno-science as our new religion.  Yet we need to be careful when people claim knowledge about soul. “Four thousand volumes of metaphysics will not teach you about soul,”   Voltaire writes.  In the same way, four thousand volumes of neurological texts will not teach you about the mysterious nature of human consciousness.

 

A hypergraphic has a tendency to be hyper-philosophical.  Does this mean that people who have a deep emotional need to find meaning in life – might be mentally disabled? Is this somehow part of the official definition of mental health?  For life is a cerebration of individuality; we all have our sui generis, our individual expression.  Writing may be a person’s mythos as a spiritual quest, an expression of their religiosity, a path in the quest to find ultimate meaning.  Through words and images, hypergraphics may be weaving into an unexplored realm of inner-space -- into uncharted territory unfamiliar to others.  Perhaps what drives people to pursue writing originates out of the same unconscious impulse as what drives a Buddhist monk to sit in meditation five hours each day.  A man may remove himself form the world as a monk in a cave; or through hypergraphic writing – which is more dysfunctional? 

 

What drives people to spew words about religious and philosophical issues?  Is it because some people are more in-tune to the human condition?  The corruption, disease, starvation, the hypocrisy, sensitized to the existential angst hovering over humanity.  Sensitized to  see problems in the inner lives of others; how many are struggling in psychological fears; the fear of losing one’s job; fear of failure in love; fear of poverty, the list goes onward, the fear of being ugly, fear of old age, and the mother of all fears – fear of death.  Hypergraphia is a form of catharsis channeling of emotions, originating out of a need to know what is behind the veil behind the human predicament.  Who are we?  Where did we come from?  Why all the suffering?

 

Aristotle asked:  “Why is it that all men who have become outstanding in philosophy, statesmanship, poetry, and the arts are melancholic?” Is it because traditionally, they have identified themselves with the little people; the suffering plight of the masses, and not the lives of a privileged few.  And could it be that through disciplined study and writing, the process itself begins to alter perception about the world and oneself.  Such changes may relate to Flaherty’s physiological explanation as to the temporal lobe changes in hypergraphic brain. 

 

I remember the time, when I met an elderly man in his late seventies; we were on a bus rolling down to Los Angeles.  He was a seasoned scholar with an incisive mind who spent most of his life in a library – pursuing knowledge and interested in the lives of writers.  And he said that most writers eventually go loony tune one way or another.  After years of reflection, I’ve come to understand what he meant. Hypergraphia has two sides, the creative and destructive.

 

Writing is one of the most powerful communication tools of humanity; and words have a transcontinental nature by which a man may peek into another world spinning inside this one.  The power of the word. Words may resonate with spirit; certain books “touch” people’s lives.  In history, we find how words altered civilizations.  Words proved their might; people kill over words; people fall in love over words.  Hypergraphics are engaged in the most ancient and most powerful of all mediums.  What drives a person to write is a means to understand oneself and the world.  Writing becomes a mirror reflecting the nakedness of one’s soul. 

        

However, hypergraphia may turn pathological when the writer becomes too self-absorbed or attached to his or her writing.  It is like a cop who is unable to let go of his ego persona of being a cop and adjust to his family as a father; such ego-delusions may destroy a writer.  Hypergraphia may become a big problem when a writer is unable separate himself from his art, his magnum opus, and believe that their work is of great importance and give it permanence by claiming it as truth.  Such a boastful attitude of approach relates to ego-ambition and identification – glorification of little self and not the big Self.  Perhaps for this reason, people end-up in mental institutions claiming to be Christ.  Ego inflation, as the feeling of walking over rainbows next to the gods, is a dangerous undertaking for humans are meant to walk underneath.  Icarus with his waxed wings is another example, and wasn’t it a long way down. 

 

Perhaps the gnostic had the best cure for pathological hypergraphia -- and graphomania (the desire to be published).  Attitude of approach will decide the outcome. In Gnosticism, Benjamin Walker writes:

 

Within the broad outlines of the Christian gospel each person, if he so desired could speculate and give expression to his view in any literary or artistic form which he chooses.  But no great importance was placed on the outcome, no claim was made that it was true, complete or final, and no attempts was made to give it permanence.

 

The essay is a commentary about Alice Flaherty's book about hypergraphia, The Midnight Disease.


Janos Sandor

 

E-mail Janos Sandor

 
Return to Table of Contents